Peer Review Process 


All submissions are double blind peer reviewed. Criteria that will be assessed as part of the review includes:

  • quality of the proposal
  • relevance to the conference themes
  • significance of research questions or issues
  • appropriateness of the research methodology and analysis
  • importance of the findings and
  • the overall logic and clarity of the conclusions and implications of the research.

For Workshops and Innovative Showcase presentations, the audience engagement will be paramount. Relevance and significance to the STEM field and conference audience, as well as expected impact for STEM2018 participants, will be given priority consideration.

Some authors who submit a proposal for the STEM in Education 2018 Conference may be expected to serve as reviewers for other proposals. Should you be selected to review, instructions will be provided to you via email once submissions have been allocated.